Étiquette : multi-objective design optimization

  • Multi-Objective design optimization of a hybrid PV-Wind-Battery system

    Multi-Objective design optimization of a hybrid PV-Wind-Battery system

    Plan :

    • Introduction
    • Data sources and load profile
    • Hybrid system models hybrid
    • Multi-objective optimization procedure
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusions and Perspectives




  • Life cycle cost, embodied energy and loss of power supply probability for the optimal design of hybrid power systems

    Life cycle cost, embodied energy and loss of power supply probability for the optimal design of hybrid power systems

    RÉSUMÉ / ABSTRACT :

    Stand-alone hybrid renewable energy systems are more reliable than one-energy source systems. However, their design is crucial.For this reason, a new methodology with the aim to design an autonomous hybrid PV-wind-battery system is proposed here. Based on a triple multi-objective optimization (MOP), this methodology combines life cycle cost (LCC), embodied energy (EE) and loss of power supply probability (LPSP). For a location, meteorological and load data have been collected and assessed. Then, components of the system and optimization objectives have been modelled. Finally, an optimal configuration has been carried out using a dynamic model and applying a controlled elitist genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization. This methodology has been applied successfully for the sizing of a PV-wind-battery system to supply at least 95% of yearly total electric demand of a residential house. Results indicate that such a method, through its multitude Pareto front solutions, will help designers to take into consideration both economic and environmental aspects.



  • Multi-Objective design optimization of a hybrid PV-WIND-BATTERY SYSTEM

    Multi-Objective design optimization of a hybrid PV-WIND-BATTERY SYSTEM

    RÉSUMÉ / ABSTRACT :

    Stand alone hybrid renewable energy systems are more reliable than a system with a single source of energy. However, its design is a crucial issue. In this context, we propose a triple Multi-Objective design, minimizing, simultaneously, Life Cycle Cost (LCC), Embodied Energy (EE) and Loss of Power Supply Probability (LPSP). Optimization has been insured by a dynamic model of the system under Matlab/Simulink and using a controlled elitist genetic algorithm. Results indicate that proposed method, through its multitude Pareto front solutions, will help designers to take into consideration environmental impact of such systems.